Potato/Po-tah-to

Yesterday a friend asked me what I thought of the Qaddafi situation. The town of Englewood, NJ is in an uproar (at least according to the media; I have not witnessed any uproaring myself) over the fact that the Libyan ruler (dictator?)  may be staying here when he comes to New York to speak in front of the United Nations.

First, I am truly amazed at how many ways there are to spell Gadhafi’s name and still be considered correct. In honor of this fact, I will never spell his name the same way twice in a row (although I will leave newspaper spellings the way I found them). Second, I completely understand why people would be upset about him staying in Englewood, but I don’t understand how they can allow themselves to be quoted saying such hysterical things.

NIMBY #1: “Unless this man comes into the U.S. and starts paying his share to reside in this community, this mayor and this community will not be coming with honeycake and sugar,” Mayor Michael Wildes said. “This is going to be an even greater drain on an already overtaxed community.”

• Translation, please??? What does this even mean? Why would this man be a drain on our community? Unless he suddenly cries poor and tries to collect welfare, how is he going to command any community funds? He travels with his own protection detail, so it’s unlikely that the city would have to oversee that. Also, now I can’t stop picturing Michael Wildes baking honeycakes.

NIMBY #2: City Council President Ken Rosenzweig said that if Gadhafi comes into the city, the council will do everything in its power to protect residents, especially immediate neighbors.

• Again, I do not get this. Qadaffi is not going to impose sharia on his block and start stoning the neighbors, so I do not understand why people would feel physically unsafe due to his nearness. He sucks, but I’ve never before heard claims that he would personally injure people. People in the immediate vicinity of the property owned by the Libyan government who are worried about their safety need to get a clue and realize that they’re probably on the safest block in the US right now.

Also:
”Gadhafi is a dangerous dictator whose hands are covered with the blood of Americans and our allies,” said U.S. Rep. Steve Rothman, whose district includes Englewood. He promised there would be ”hell to pay” if the U.S. State Department violates a long-standing deal barring the dictator from staying at the Libyan estate.

• Lay off the Internet Tough Guy speech there, Rothman; I doubt you can back that up. What, exactly, is he going to do to the State Department if Qadaffi is allowed to stay at the estate? Oh, right. Nothing. He may get lucky, though, as he is now saying that the White House and the State Department are urging Gaddafi to stay in New York City.

And finally:
A lot of articles about Kaddafi mention tents, and at first I thought it was some sort of ignorance, with people assuming that the Northern African dude must live in a tent. But, behold: he actually does travel with a tent. And he may need it, now that the city of Englewood has revoked work permits for improvements being made to the house owned by the Libyan government.

My personal feelings:
Gadhafi is scum, and knowingly supports criminals. He is no friend of this country or our ideals, and I’m conflicted about the fact that you can’t arrest and imprison people for sucking, but then all the politicians would be incarcerated and there’d be nobody to ru[i]n things.